The magic solution for ethereum? Brotherhood code ethereum

The magic solution for ethereum? Brotherhood code ethereum

Developers continue to contradict another controversial software update, and meanwhile, some of the world’s lightest industry minds are working to find a solution to a serious issue of consensus in the community lately. Recent talks on the return of lost funds led to internal conflicts. Developers question the authority they have to make controversial changes, while appealing to the public to give their opinion on this issue.

After Parity funds have been frozen, a new group of developers are looking to better organize such debates in order to reach a sort of global consensus that they think the project needs to move forward.

Led by developer Greg Colvin and Jamie Pitts of the Ethereum Foundation, the Ethereum Code Brotherhood hopes to come up with a structured workgroup where ethereum coders can co-ordinate with best practices for open source software development.

Here is the next problem – there are many, many millions of dollars blocked without reason, and technically we could solve this problem, but should we solve it? And again, we do not have forums to reach a consensus on these issues ” Colvin said in an interview.

Usually the loss of funds is the result of a defective code. Some developers view the return of funds as an obligation, and others believe that such an action might even be a crime. But differences of opinion have led to bitter conflicts.

I think the level of collegiality between researchers and developers makes it easy for a civilized conversation” Colvin said.

The situation is even worse because in the case of decentralized protocols, any misunderstanding can lead to different software versions that compete with each other – as happened with the DAO attack in 2016, which led to the creation of a code rival and distinct coin, ethereum classic.

I think DAO is an example of a major move without proper consensus,” Colvin said. “The Brotherhood of the ethereum code would be an attitude-making community and say – let’s organize ourselves to a form of consensus around these issues

Governance of Scalability and Fraternity of the ethereum code
To support Colvin’s idea, the recent dispute has revealed some defects in the development process of valuable cryptocurrency per total.

Originally proposed to simplify the return process, EIP867 was criticized by some. PI editor Yoichi Hirai has refused to implement the proposal at the outset. Hirai’s decision as well as the proposal itself made the community think once again about how much change needs to be implemented. Some people question the process is too centralized.

I do not want to be part of the ethereum community if a single entity can block any proposal” wrote Afri Schoedon of Parity on Twitter.

According to Colvin, such issues are based on how quickly the community grew.

Core developers were initially a small group of people who knew each other,” Colvin said. If at that early stage, technical decisions could have been made easier, at the time he said – “It’s a much larger group, it’s spread all over the world.

After asking for participation on Reddit, the Ethhereum Code Brotherhood wants to start a workshop at the next ethhereum community conference, EthCC, next month in Paris. From now on, Colvin hopes that this will be extended to a dedicated council by July.

Colvin argues that these meetings in person can do much to solve technical conflicts that can persist online for years.

Sometimes you have to sit down with a person and get to know someone and set up a level of communication that did not exist before” Colvin said.

Consensus broadly

In this way, the ethereum Code Fraction shapes its structure after the Engineer’s Working Group, or IETF, an international team of technicians working to maintain the Internet.

“IETF is perhaps the most relevant example of success in the field,” Colvin said. “He kept the Internet for years. IETF is built to work with large numbers and does this by combining large assemblies with smaller and more specialized groups. Each group does what they have to do, and only a nerd here and there would be interested in several of them ”

Like the IETF, the Brotherhood’s governance process supports what is called “broad consensus and code running,” meaning that a dominant majority in a discussion will have superiority, depending on technical talent – the most important criterion for any position held within the group.

Important for Colvin is that IETF has these results without corporate finance or sponsorship that would influence collective activity.

We do not want to be a sort of order coming from above to the community. There must be a forum, a consensus building a forum in the community ” Colvin said.

Bigger questions

By combining an open process, a structure of informal members and a focus on technical responsibility, Colvin asserts that the Brotherhood can eventually provide a platform for the community to solve the more sensitive issues.

Indeed, the problem of lost funds is not the only turning point today of etehreum. It seems a trivial discussion if we compare it with the changes that need to be implemented in the process.

We are talking here about moving from the concept of proof-of-work to proof-of-stakes, when we are still working on a stalemate, though we are not sure whether it will work. We are talking about switching to sharding with two or three different designs at work. We are talking about very big changes to the protocol

According to him, it is important that the large community of developers, not just core developers, have a say in these fundamental changes.

Are we going to the stake-proof? There are a few people who are interested in it and who know they can contribute. That’s the idea, it’s an offer made to the community ” Colvin said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: